[目的]探讨研究团体心理治疗对康复期抑郁症患者疗效的影响因素。[方法]以2018年12月至2019年10月为时间段,选择我院收诊的60例康复期抑郁症患者作为对象。根据随机数表法,将其分成对照组、观察组两组,每组30例。对照组给予常规治疗,观察组配合团体心理治疗。对比观察临床疗效,且分析影响治疗效果的因素。[结论](1)观察组的总有效率高于对照组(90% vs 73.3%),有统计学差异(P<0.05);(2)观察组治疗后的HAMD评分及HAMA评分低于对照组,组间数据有统计学差异(P<0.05);(3)经不同方式干预治疗,观察组MOSIE各指标评分优于对照组,二组有统计学差异(P<0.05);(4)分析发现,年龄、性别、文化程度、工作状态、家庭关系与临床疗效有关。[结论]康复期抑郁症通过团体心理治疗,可取得满意疗效,但也容易受到一些因素干扰,需注意。
团体心理治疗;康复期;抑郁症;疗效;影响因素
[Objective] to explore the influence factors of group psychotherapy on the curative effect of patients with depression in convalescence. [Methods] from December 2018 to October 2019, 60 patients with depression in convalescence were selected as subjects. According to the method of random number table, it was divided into two groups: control group and observation group, 30 cases in each group. The control group was given routine treatment, the observation group with group psychotherapy. Compare and observe the clinical effect, and analyze the factors that affect the therapeutic effect. [Conclusion ] (1) the total effective rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (90% vs 73.3%), with statistical difference (P < 0.05); (2) the HAMD score and HAMA score of the observation group after treatment were lower than those of the control group, with statistical difference between the groups (P < 0.05); (3) the mosie scores of the observation group were better than those of the control group after different intervention treatments, with statistical difference between the two groups (P < 0.05); (4) )It was found that age, gender, education level, working status, family relationship were related to clinical efficacy. [Conclusion ] group psychotherapy can achieve satisfactory results in convalescent depression, but it is also easy to be interfered by some factors.
group psychotherapy; convalescence; depression; efficacy; influencing factors